NICE Recommendation Set to Leave Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Melanoma Without Access to Yervoy (Ipilimumab)
Bristol-Myers Squibb has expressed its disappointment that the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued draft guidance which effectively denies access to Yervoy (ipilimumab) for NHS patients with previously-untreated advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma, not involved in clinical trials.
Ipilimumab is currently recommended by NICE for the treatment of adults with previously treated advanced melanoma[2] and, in November 2013, European regulators extended its licence to include use in previously untreated patients, recognising both its potential to significantly increase overall survival and the unmet need in this patient population. Unless reversed, this decision will restrict access to all NHS patients that have not had prior therapy. Ipilimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that works by stimulating the patient’s own immune system to fight the cancer[4] and is one of the most significant treatment advances for this disease in many years.
The National Cancer Drug Fund (NCDF) panel has reviewed ipilimumab in previously untreated patients and decided to refer it for baseline commissioning by NHS England. This is a 6-month process, during which time patients will not be able to access ipilimumab through the National Cancer Drugs Fund.
“Clinically, there is little difference between pre-treated and untreated advanced melanoma patients and ipilimumab is licensed to treat both types,” said, Professor John Wagstaff, Consultant Oncologist at the South West Wales Cancer Institute & Swansea School of Medicine. “Today’s decision will be disappointing news for many patients with advanced melanoma who have not received prior treatment, leaving them without immediate access to this innovative therapy. Ipilimumab has demonstrated its ability to increase overall survival in this cancer, in some cases having a long-term effect on the survival of previously-treated patients. Making it available as a first treatment option should therefore be seen as an important step in helping to maximise survival in this disease.”
In previously treated advanced melanoma, ipilimumab has been shown to provide durable long-term survival in some patients[1]. Upon its approval in 2011, it became the first treatment to demonstrate an overall survival benefit in a Phase III clinical trial in this patient population. In the pivotal Phase III clinical trial assessing ipilimumab in previously treated patients, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2010, 46% (63 people out of 137) of patients were still alive at one year in the ipilimumab arm and 25% (34 people out of 136) in the comparator, a vaccine called gp100.
The median overall survival was 10.1 months among patients receiving ipilimumab alone, compared to 6.4 months among patients receiving gp100 alone.5 In 2013, Bristol-Myers Squibb announced results from a pooled analysis of survival data taken from previously-treated and previously-untreated patients who received ipilimumab at different doses and regimens, including combinations with other agents (n=1,861) [1,6]. When looking at survival over time, a plateau in the survival curve began at approximately 3 years, with a few patients followed for up to 10 years. Approximately 22% of patients (95% CI: (20–24%) were alive at 3 years (number of patients available for analysis at this time point was 254) [1,6]. The analysis was retrospective and did not include a control arm.
Ipilimumab’s use in previously untreated patients with advanced melanoma is supported by data pooled from Phase II and III studies[1], as well as from two retrospective observational studies in previously-untreated advanced melanoma patients who were treated with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg monotherapy (studies CA184- 332 and CA184-338) [7,8]. Available data have demonstrated that, as monotherapy at this 3 mg/kg dose, treatment with ipilimumab has the potential to improve the overall survival of patients, irrespective of whether they have received prior therapy or not for their metastatic melanoma [1,5,7,8]. The safety profile of ipilimumab in previously-untreated patients is also comparable to that seen in those who have been previously-treated [5,7,8].
Gill Nuttall, Melanoma UK commented: “Advanced melanoma is a devastating diagnosis, yet treatment options remain severely limited for many patients facing this disease. Unless reversed, this decision by NICE will sadly continue this trend and will leave some patients without a medicine that could potentially help extend their lives.”
Commenting on the decision, Amadou Diarra, European Vice-President and General Manager, Bristol-Myers Squibb UK & Ireland, said: “Bristol-Myers Squibb is disappointed in the draft recommendation that NICE has issued and we are committed to doing all we can to ensure that patients ultimately get access to this important treatment as early as possible. Ipilimumab is a pioneering immuno-oncology therapy that has been recognised by European regulators as an important option for advanced melanoma patients who have not received prior therapy. We therefore hope that the significant unmet need and clinical evidence backing this treatment will result in a review of this decision.”
References
1. Schadendorf D et al. Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase II and phase III trials of ipilimumab in metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable melanoma. Abstract # 24LBA, presented at the European Cancer Congress 2013
2. https://guidance.nice.org.uk/TA268 (accessed February 2014)
3. https://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/keyfacts/skin-cancer (accessed January 2014)
4- www.medicines.org.uk/EMC/searchresults.aspx?term=yervoy&searchtype=QuickSearch (accessed: January 2014)
5. Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010; 10:1-13
6. https://news.bms.com/press-release/rd-news/bristol-myers-squibb-announces-long-term-survival-results-pooled-analysis-yerv
7. Patt D, Juday T, Penrod JR et al. A community-based, real-world, study of treatment-naive advanced melanoma (AM) patients treated with 3mg/kg ipilimumab (IPI) in the United States. European Cancer Congress; Amsterdam, Netherlands 27 September–1 October 2013, Poster 3.751
8. Margolin K, et al. Effectiveness and safety of first-line ipilimumab 3 mg/kg therapy for advanced melanoma: Evidence from a U.S. multisite retrospective chart review. ECCO/ESMO 2013 Abstract #3742
9. Larkin J, Gore M. Malignant Melanoma (metastatic). Clinical Evidence 2008; 08; 1718
Related News
-
News Introducing the Pharmaceutical Sustainability Ecosystem from CPHI
The Sustainability Collective from CPHI unveils the groundbreaking Pharmaceutical Sustainability Ecosystem to drive pharmaceutical knowledge sharing, connection, and collaboration in order to change the face of sustainability in pharmceutical... -
News US Government shutdown leads to the FDA grinding to a halt
The US Congress reached a deadlock after not being able to come to an agreement regarding funding, specifically reaching an impasse when Republicans and Democrats were unable to reach an agreement regarding Obamacare subsidies. The resulting shutdown o... -
News Biosimilars for the better: an expert view from Ecolab
Ecolab expert Renato Azevedo shares his insights on the current state of the biosimilars market in pharmaceuticals, after a high number of biosimilar drug approvals throughout the year confirming the shift of focus in this field. -
News US FDA announces new priority vouchers for accelerated review times
The US FDA announced a new priority program for drug developers – the Commissioner’s National Priority Voucher (CNPV) program aims to enhance the health interests of the US by allowing drug developers to redeem a voucher, shortening th... -
News CPHI Podcast Series: US drug policy – exploring the executive orders
The latest episode of the CPHI Podcast Series provides a timely overview of the recent policy changes in the USA, with President Trump signing excecutive orders to change drug pricing under a 'Most Favoured Nation' scheme.
-
News PhRMA trade association issues comments on Section 232 investigation
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), an American trade association representing groups in the pharmaceutical industry, issued a letter on May 6, 2026 to the Department of Commerce regarding the Section 232 National Security... -
News Pharmaceutical Packaging Market Prospects: Shifting regional policies
The pharmaceutical packaging industry is experiencing significant transformation in 2025, driven by regulatory changes, supply chain challenges, and sustainability initiatives. The US BIOSECURE Act, passed through the House of Representatives in Septem... -
News The next 15 drugs up for negotiation with Medicare include several blockbusters
By now, everyone is quite familiar with the drug price negotiations taking place between drug companies and the Centres for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in the USA as part of measures being taken to reduce the cost of drugs for patients, to make ...